|
Post by cajones on Jul 18, 2006 2:25:41 GMT -5
Here is where the remains of the adbots that attack the Jeqo message board shall be displayed. These are posters that post as guests, posting complete gibberish, amid a huge list of links with no purpose other than advertising. Most of these are violators of the proboards terms of service, and all are violators of the rules of the Jeqo message boards.
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Jul 18, 2006 2:30:03 GMT -5
IP Address 221.192.169.202 Never IP Address 221.192.170.186 Never IP Address 60.6.1.2 Never IP Address 221.194.184.219 Never IP Address 220.72.196.70 Never IP Address 219.195.248.140 Never IP Address 218.55.191.97 Never IP Address 221.194.188.58 Never IP Address 60.6.22.25 Never IP Address 60.6.84.96 Never
* never refers to the time for which the ban is scheduled to be lifted. ** These are all bot IPs, but that doesn't mean they aren't being stolen by the bot(s) to mask its/their identity(ies).
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Aug 31, 2006 12:45:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Feb 18, 2008 13:06:11 GMT -5
And we made it a year and a half, too...
58.17.145.18 posted the same spam on three boards. Banned. Disclosed. We need a privacy policy.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfstar on Feb 22, 2008 0:16:28 GMT -5
Here lies jackass, who's... ass has been jacked?
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Mar 9, 2008 6:57:45 GMT -5
Another one bites the dust...
58.242.216.178 spammed a rather business-like thread. Instead of doing the proffessional thing and deleting the post, I made a poorly formatted DELETED block. Sir, we don't want your spam. Banned.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfstar on Mar 17, 2008 6:31:31 GMT -5
Not just banned... PWN'D!
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Mar 17, 2008 13:05:55 GMT -5
58.242.217.178 joins the junkyard. (Anyone notice a similarity to the other spam sellers?)
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Aug 2, 2008 22:35:10 GMT -5
124.64.114.223 put a little thought into the nonsensical garbled links (as much as can be said for a robot), this time electing to just attack a single preexisting topic with a series of posts that managed to deal a blow to IE7 and JFW5 before victory could be attained. [glow=ornge,3,200][shadow=yellow,4,300]DELETED![/shadow][/glow]
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Aug 5, 2008 8:44:26 GMT -5
Persistent little buggers. This time one robot used several guest IDs to attack a single topic. ... and jaws died twice. Congratulations, 123.119.198.39, for thou art... [glow=orange,3,200][shadow=yellow,4,300]DELETED![/shadow][/glow]
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Sept 2, 2008 11:23:32 GMT -5
123.119.195.116 was kinda long in coming, but technical problems... mde... delays. On the otherhand, we have another IP address I don't feel like copying. This one had a user account. Bot or not, it behaves like one, so it's getting posted as one.
Spam over wowposter = very banned
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Feb 16, 2009 19:18:00 GMT -5
65.49.14.11 took a creative route and posted something that probably came from a chainletter, but filled it with random links that didn't fit in context at all. I have no idea what that's supposed to accomplished, but eh, [glow=orange,3,200]DELETED![/glow]
But hey, just so we have something to remember you by, I'll post the whole thing (links dead, of course). Enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfstar on Feb 16, 2009 22:58:52 GMT -5
It was more creative than the previous Jack'd asses.
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Feb 20, 2009 11:22:18 GMT -5
Another one bites the dust. 65.49.2.16 did... well... the exact same thing, just ripped off a different motivational chainletter. Note (that should be obvious to everyone by now, but I figured with the thread I might as well say it) : These seem to come in waves that try similar strategies, then fiz out. I'd not be surprised if a couple more showed up between now and April, then they went quiet for a few months. But I guess we'll see.
Oh, and... umm... [glow=brown3,100]DELETED.[/glow]. <--behold my enthusiasm.
|
|
|
Post by cajones on Mar 2, 2009 3:43:07 GMT -5
65.49.14.130, with three motivational chainletters at once! Stop making me reconsider deleting or modifying your posts on the grounds that someone might find their not advertisement elements interesting and/or useful! Fortunately for da rules, wrong boards, my digital assailants. (I expect this is one of those cringe-posts.). Anyway... Oh, and I'm thinking of further limiting guest access to certain areas. I don't want to lock people out (with the comment system down thanks to the email problem). What to do...
|
|